ADVERTISEMENT
image

Pharmaceutical Industry (Management)

Pharmacists in industry management roles, such as directors or vice presidents, guide strategy and operations across areas such as research and development, medical affairs, regulatory policy, and commercial functions. They leverage scientific and clinical expertise along with leadership, communication, and business skills to drive product development, expand patient access, and shape organizational direction. These positions provide high levels of autonomy, opportunities for advancement, and the ability to influence health care on a global scale.

Meet the Pharmacist

Mrs. Catherine Avery
Chief of Clinical Pharmacist, Seattle Pharmacy Group

Mrs. Avery is a board-certified clinical pharmacist with over 28 years of experience in managing complex medication therapies. She is passionate about patient education and leveraging technology to improve health outcomes.
At Wellness Pharmacy Group, he leads a team of dedicated pharmacists committed to providing personalized care and expert advice.

Mr. John Doe, PharmaD
Lead Clinical Pharmacist, Wellness Pharmacy Group

Dr. Chen is a board-certified clinical pharmacist with over 12 years of experience in managing complex medication therapies. He is passionate about patient education and leveraging technology to improve health outcomes.
At Wellness Pharmacy Group, he leads a team of dedicated pharmacists committed to providing personalized care and expert advice.

Table of Contents

  • Background
  • Characteristics
  • Insider’s perspective
  • Most appealing aspects
  • Least appealing aspects
  • Advice
  • Critical factor ratings
  • Critical factors
  • References/resources
  • Professional organizations

Background

There are many diverse opportunities for pharmacists in the pharmaceutical and biotech industry, leveraging their scientific and clinical knowledge. Roles can be found in corporate affairs, research and development, biomedical researchers, medical information, medical science liaisons, regulatory affairs, and various commercial areas. A strong background in biomedical sciences, research, pharmacology, and clinical practice, combined with advanced degrees or specialized training (residencies, fellowships), can be highly beneficial.

Many leverage key competencies including:

  • Scientific and clinical knowledge
  • Communication skills
  • Analytical skills
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Adaptability
  • Learning agility

This profile highlights information related to specific roles held by directors and vice presidents across the pharmaceutical industry.

Characteristics

A total of 36 pharmaceutical industry directors and vice presidents responded to the 2024–2025 APhA Career Pathways Program Survey. Thirty-one percent of the respondents completed a fellowship, and 19.0 % completed a residency. An additional 8.33% received a PhD, an MPH, or an MBA degree. An additional 6.1% received a MS degree.

Information provided indicated that pharmacists in this profile have an average age of 48 years old. The median salary for director in the United States pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry falls between $122,000 and $227,000 annually. The median total pay for a director is around $258,151. Total pay can included bonuses and profit sharing depending on the specific position and the company. The median salary for a vice president falls between $140,000 and $350,000 or even higher, dependent on the size and type of company.

The average time worked was the standard 40 hours per week. The number of hours can depend on the specific type of position, department, and size of the organization. Sixty-three percent indicated that they travel for work. Another 18.2% indicated that they work nights and weekends.

A total of 25 pharmacists responded directly to a question about what they felt was an important skill for their role. The group provided numerous responses to the open-ended question regarding the most important skill in their current role. Two skills stood out the most: leadership (20.0%) and communication (16.0%).

Insider’s perspective

Respondents listed the following critical factors as those being the most important to them. Please note that a factor can rank highly based on wanting the factor or wanting to avoid the factor. As an example, some may rank repetitive activities as a top factor as this is something that they want or look to avoid in their practice. The factors listed below are based on the number of respondents who indicated these would be the top five factors they would like to have in a role. Note that there are 25 total critical factors from which to select.

Top 5 – first tier

Of interest is that this group listed a few of the different critical factors at the same percentage.

  • Application of knowledge (clinical or scientific) (19.4%)
  • Leisure and family time (16.7%)
  • Autonomy (16.7%)
  • Innovative thinking (11.1%)
  • Problem solving (11.1%)

In addition to the top 5 factors, the second tier of critical factors are listed below. Note that one of the factors, innovative thinking, is listed in both areas. This can be interpreted to mean some these factors are in their top five list while for others they are a close second.

Top 5 – second tier

  • Innovative thinking (27.8%)
  • Compensation (11.1%)
  • Collaborating with health professionals (11.1%)
  • Ongoing coworker/client relationships (5.56%)
  • Area of expertise (generalized versus specialized) (5.56%)

Regarding the application of knowledge and area of expertise, a respondent from Tennessee indicated, “I didn’t feel (there was an) opportunity to advance as a clinical specialist, so I went back to do a fellowship after 10 years of clinical practice.”

There are many rewarding and challenging experiences in being a pharmacist in the pharmaceutical industry. Eleven percent of the respondents indicated that a rewarding aspect is the launch of a new product. Numerous other areas were highlighted by the respondents.

A respondent from Georgia stated, “Communication of complex ideas: both rewarding and challenging at the same time.” Another respondent from New Jersey added, “Rewarding–providing outreach to the community. Challenging–juggling numerous responsibilities.”

A couple of additional rewarding statements from respondents include one from Missouri, “Launching a product to market for a rare disease and hearing directly from patients, and the profound impact it has had on their life.”

A respondent from Pennsylvania stated that a rewarding aspect for them is that they “(Are) an Authorized Nuclear Pharmacist (ANP) due my training. I am licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to handle radionuclides.”

Fifteen percent indicated that geographic work location, flexibility, and work schedule as additional factors that are important to them. In addition, 12.1% listed self-worth/value and 9.01% listed pressure/stress.

The directors and vice presidents in the pharmaceutical industry had a variety of responses that they provided as highlights of their career and where they see the future of the role. Several of the responses are listed below.

  • “Growth, challenges, opportunities to come together as a profession.”
  • “Impacting greater numbers (of patients) in the community.”
  • “Running a very large business with thousands of colleagues to impact a large number of lives.”
  • “Lots of technological advancements.”
  • “Continued need for marketers to be able to adapt to new ways of approaching the role so as not to be replaced by AI or out of the box options.”
  • “Bring a part of a movement for advancing the practice of pharmacy.”
  • “Launching four different drugs in disease states with high unmet need (hemophilia and postpartum depression).”
  • “Pandemic response.”
  • “Lots of progress, rapidly, with the onset of AI.”

Most appealing aspects

What aspects of the role are most appealing?

Respondents listed several different aspects that are appealing. Flexibility was listed most often by 13.9% of the respondents. This was followed by variety (8.33%). One respondent from Pennsylvania stated they enjoyed that the role is “Extremely flexible. I am able to make a difference within the entirety of the U.S., impact others, and provide resources/training for pharmacists across the country” A different respondent from Pennsylvania added, “Scientific and engaging thinking every day; intelligent scientists as coworkers; ability to make my own schedule; reward for hard work and contributions.” One additional respondent summed this up briefly when they stated, “Variety, no two days are alike.”

Least appealing aspects

What aspects of the role are least appealing?

On the other side of the spectrum are the aspects of the role that are not appealing. There was no specific theme to the responses. One of the pharmacists from Missouri indicated, “Like many roles, dealing with negative behaviors of people.” Another from North Carolia added, “The lack of patient care or community engagement.” One different respondent from Missouri added, “Managing corporate expectations.”

Advice

What advice should student pharmacists and practitioners consider when selecting a position in the pharmaceutical industry (director or vice president role)?

Respondents provided advice across several areas. One specific trend came through: “Take a chance/risk” (on the pharmaceutical industry) was listed by 11.1% of the respondents. One respondent from Georgia stated, “Take a chance to see if this area is of interest. Talk to people already in the pharmaceutical industry about the different opportunities.” Another from Missouri added, “Take risks and recognize that you will have to move up in your career. In addition, you will most likely have to move down or laterally to achieve what you really want to, and that’s OKAY!”

The following list provides a partial sample of the open-ended comments from pharmaceutical industry directors and vice presidents:

  • “Work hard and be flexible since things change in our field constantly. Also, soft skills (communication, teamwork, reliability) are just as important as clinical skills.”
  • “Learn about pharmaceutical companies/groups and roles/responsibilities; every pharmacist has a different career path.”
  • “All classes in pharmacy school are important and will come back to haunt you. Pay attention!”
  • “Take risks to learn more and network, even when it's uncomfortable.”
  • “Leave ego at the door, take an entry-level job with a target position in mind, and create a plan to advance to that position. There is a place for any PharmD in industry, whether it is in medical writing, clinical development, or otherwise.”
  • “It's hard work, but worth it! Try to take advantage of opportunities and build a network of people in various fields; you never know when a small ‘side project’ might turn into something far more important.”

Critical factor ratings

Opportunities for advancement
[To what degree does your work allow for advancement?]

Pharmaceutical industry directors and vice presidents rated the opportunity for advancement as the highest critical factor in the profile at an upper range of 8.50.

One respondent from Tennessee provided a broad look at advancement when they stated, “Appreciation for lateral movement and how that is also ‘advancement’ is an important part of growth and learning in the industry. Most people always think of advancement of going from [manager] to director, but it can be from manager of medical information to manager of marketing. This broadening of skill set is valuable and allows for agility in times when the job market is tough.” Another respondent from Missouri added, “On a leadership path, the ceiling is high, and the variety of directions and places within our industry are wide.”

Another pharmacist from North Carolina indicated, “My dual degree has given me my opportunity to be able to find multiple and different career opportunities.” Finally, a respondent from Pennsylvania stated, “I don't know of any other career path (in pharmacy), that a pharmacist could enter that provides greater opportunity for advancement than the pharmaceutical industry.”

8.50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little advancement opportunities 10 = Great opportunities for advancement

Leadership development/professional involvement
[To what extent does your work allow for the development of leadership skills and professional involvement in the pharmacy profession?]

Respondents rated this factor with a 7.69 mid-range rating.

One pharmacist from Missouri looked at this from a professional and personal standpoint and stated, “In a leadership role, I practice my leadership skills daily and use them in my personal life too. Professional involvement is something that I have valued and prioritized throughout my career, and I consider this independent of any role/job.” Another from Pennsylvania added, “Leadership increases with title changes, and there are many opportunities for title changes with the ability to manage personnel.”

One respondent from Arizonia had a slightly different viewpoint when they indicated, “I would say my role allows for both but not as it relates to the pharmacy profession since I work in marketing in the pharmaceutical industry.” A different respondent from Pennsylvania stated, “Continuous development is essential for feeling like I am moving forward.”

7.69
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little development of leadership skills and professional involvement 10 = Great opportunities for leadership development and professional involvement

Community impact
[How much impact does your work have in terms of serving the community?]

Respondents rated their impact on the community with a 7.07 rating.

One pharmacists from New Jersey stated, “My team provides processing of expanded access requests for patient need in countries.” Another from Pennsylvania added, “It's different as we are not involved in direct patient care, but since we work at a system level with large health systems, we help those systems improve care to our community.”

One respondent from Minnesota indicated that they are, “Helping patients access medications.”

7.07
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little impact 10 = High level of impact

Autonomy
[To what extent does your work allow for autonomy in decision making?]

Respondents indicated a 7.79 upper mid-range rating for autonomy.

One respondent from Missouri stated, “Executive roles come with a large amount of autonomy which is paired with a balance of the right level of communication in order to remain collaborative and to prevent surprises for one's boss and team members.” Another from Pennsylvania added, “This all depends on the manager. In my career my managers have given me a lot of freedom to complete projects and tasks in my own manner.”

7.79
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Very little low autonomy 10 = High level of autonomy

Focus
[To what extent does your work allow you to be focused on the future versus a focus only on immediate tasks?]

Respondents rated focus in the mid-range with a 7.54 rating.

A pharmacist from New Jersey provided the following thoughts, “Continuous improvement always a focus to make process efficient for internal/external.” Another from Missouri stated, “As vice president of operations, I experience the need to address current issues while planning for our future daily.”

One additional respondent from Pennsylvania added, “We are always thinking about the future in terms of new drug application (NDA) filing, but not as much beyond that.”

7.54
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Immediate tasks only 10 = Tasks focused on the future

Prestige
[To what extent does your work provide professional prestige?]

Prestige was rated 7.50 by pharmaceutical industry management.

One respondent from Missouri stated that “Prestige is in the eye of the beholder.” Another from Pennsylvania looked at this a little different and stated, “There are ample opportunities to write and publish papers in my current role.”

7.50
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Provides low prestige 10 = Provides high prestige

Creating value/positive outcomes
[To what extent does your work allow for personal fulfillment through the creation of value and positive outcomes?]

Most of the respondents felt that they do create value and work toward positive outcomes as they rated this factor 7.61.

One respondent from Pennsylvania put it this way: “Compared to community or clinical pharmacy work, there is no personal connection with patients, but I still feel personally fulfilled by the work that I do.”

7.61
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little extent 10 = High extent

Patient relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with patients?]

As would be expected, pharmaceutical industry directors and vice presidents have little to no ongoing relationships with patients and rated this factor 1.21.

One respondent from Iowa provided the following, “Direct patient engagement is limited to specific roles or circumstances; it does not involve direct patient care.” Another from Missouri stated, “Everyone has an opportunity to make relationships with their coworkers. Today I am not patient-facing but consider my impact on patients exponential by supporting patient-facing pharmacists which gives me satisfaction.”

1.21
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No ongoing/long-term relationships 10 = All are long-term relationships

Coworker/client relationships
[To what degree do you have ongoing or long-term relationships with coworkers or clients?]

Respondents feel that they can develop relationships with coworkers and clients over time with a rating of 7.89.

A respondent from Pennsylvania stated, “Being on good terms with the people who I interact with most commonly directly relates to my quality of life.”

7.89
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No ongoing/long-term relationships 10 = All are long-term relationships

Writing/conducting research
[How often do you engage in writing and/or conducting research?]

Writing/conducting research was rated 5.41 by pharmaceutical industry management.

One respondent from California stated, “Everything in early phase drug development is focused on research.” Another pharmacist from Missouri added, “I often write content for articles/blogs, but it is not a high percentage of my work time.”

5.41
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Generating new ideas
[To what degree does your work involve generating new ideas?]

Generating new ideas was rated 7.79 by pharmaceutical industry management.

One respondent from Pennsylvania stated, “In working with health system decision makers, we often assist with brainstorming/idea generation and project development for quality improvement.” Another respondent from New Jersey indicated their response in just one word, “Continuously.”

A different respondent from New Jersey indicated that this was the key critical factor for them when they stated, “This is my number 1! I enjoy being innovative, and it is very important to me. If this was not part of my career/job responsibilities, then I would not be happy.”

7.79
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little innovative thinking 10 = High degree of innovative thinking

Supervision/management
[To what extent do you spend your time organizing, managing, or supervising others and/or business operations?]

Respondents were mid-range regarding spending time supervising others/business operations with a 5.86 rating.

One pharmacist from New Jersey stated, “As a team leader, I am responsible and accountable for my team.” Another from Massachusetts indicated that they enjoy “Supervising student pharmacists and residents (when on a rotation at the company).”

Another respondent from Pennsylvania added, “I don't have direct reports, but I do spend time organizing and managing projects.”

5.86
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Patient interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with patients?]

Respondents rated patient interaction as the lowest critical factor in the profile with a rating at 0.75.

One respondent from New Jersey stated they were concerned about the “Lack of direct patient interaction.” This was reinforced by another pharmacist from Missouri who stated the exact same comment, “Lack of direct patient interaction.”

0.75
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Public interaction
[How much time do you spend interacting with the public?]

Respondents rated interacting with the public as a low-range factor rating of 2.64.

One respondent from New Jersey stated that they “Speak at external meetings/forum.” another respondent from Ohio simply stated, “Public speaking.”

2.64
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Collaboration
[How often do you work or collaborate with other health professionals or educate other professionals in your work?]

Collaboration was rated 7.22 by pharmaceutical industry management.

A respondent from Pennsylvania stated, “The health professionals on the clinical development side of industry need very little additional education since they are focused on the therapeutic area of research.” Another respondent from New Jersey indicated, “I provide administrative oversight of interprofessional education.”

7.22
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = None of my time 10 = All my time

Family/leisure time
[How much free time do you have for leisure and family activities in your work?]

At a 6.48 rating, pharmacists are mid-range in the time they have for leisure and family activities.

One respondent from New Jersey put this simply that they have “Good work-life balance.” Another from Pennsylvania added, “It ebbs and flows.”

A different respondent from Pennsylvania stated, “My purpose in life is more related to my family than my career, so this is indispensable.”

6.48
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Little free time 10 = Plenty of time for family and leisure activities

Impact on well-being
[To what degree do you impact the well-being of individuals?]

Respondents feel that they have a mid-range impact on well-being with a 7.11 rating.

A respondent :from Pennsylvania provided an interesting perspective when they said, “If the drug is approved, there is high impact. If not, there is low/no impact.” Another respondent from North Carolina simply stated that impact occurs “Indirectly.”

7.11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Low degree 10 = High degree

Problem solving
[To what degree do you solve problems with tried-and-true alternatives versus untested alternatives in your work?]

Problem solving was a mid-range rating of 5.55 by pharmaceutical industry management.

One respondent from New Jersey provided their thoughts on problem solving, saying, “I do not believe in change for the sake of change, but I do strive to address problems with fresh eyes, to research and review data, and to think outside of the box.” Another respondent from Tennessee stated, “A part of marketing is being able to test out tried and true ideas and new ones.”

One additional respondent provided the following, “I enjoy problem solving and creating. If I did not have this in my job, I would not feel challenged.”

5.55
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Tried and true 10 = Untested alternatives

Expertise
[How general or specialized is the expertise required in your work?]

Pharmacists indicated that their expertise leans toward the specialized side with a rating of 7.52.

One respondent from New Jersey stated, “Expertise is required, we strive to be subject matter experts.” A different respondent from New Jersey added, “EA/compassionate use is a niche area—not all are aware.”

7.52
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Generalized 10 = Specialized

Repetition
[To what degree is your work composed of activities and tasks that are highly repetitive versus highly variable?]

Respondents rated repetition at 6.00, a mid-range response between being highly repetitive and highly variable.

One respondent from Pennsylvania stated, “To me this is the best balance; lack of mundane repetition, but enough that work is not stressful.” Another from New Jersey stated, “As an administrator, I am faced with new challenges every day.”

6.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Highly repetitive 10 = Highly variable

Applying scientific knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying scientific knowledge in your work?]

Respondents rated this factor at 6.96, slightly higher that the application of clinical knowledge.

One respondent from Pennsylvania indicated that “Scientific thinking is more important than clinical expertise in trials with healthy participants.” Another pharmacist from New York added, “I spent so much time in pharmacy school that not to apply my knowledge seems like a waste.”

6.96
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No application 10 = High level of application all the time

Applying clinical knowledge
[How much of your time is spent applying clinical knowledge in your work?]

Respondents rated this factor slightly lower that application of scientific knowledge with a 6.15 rating.

A respondent from New Jersey stated, “Clinical knowledge was previously 10 but has decreased since I entered administration. I still use clinical knowledge extensively for program development and implementation and continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives.”

6.15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = No application 10 = High level of application all the time

Parental leave
[To what extent does your work setting offer parental leave opportunities?]

Respondents were mixed in their response with a 6.11 rating to parental leave, as some do not have the need for this factor.

A respondent from Texas provides the following information, “I received 12 weeks of unpaid leave through FMLA, but I opted to use 8 weeks of short-term-disability benefits that were allowed to be for a c-section. Through short-term disability, I received less than half of what my usual pay is for those 8 weeks.” Another from Pennsylvania simple stated that this “Depends on the company.”

6.11
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Limited opportunities 10 = Unlimited opportunities

Compensation
[To what degree do you feel compensated for your responsibilities in your work?]

Compensation is the second highest rated critical factor for pharmaceutical industry management at a 7.93 rating.

A pharmacist from Pennsylvania stated, “I never expected to be so well-compensated in my career, and I am only 5 years in the pharmaceutical industry.” Another from Tennessee added, “Base salary and a 20% bonus is a very comfortable compensation.”

7.93
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Not well compensated 10 = Well compensated

Benefit package
[How comprehensive is the employee benefit package offered in your work setting?]

Respondents indicated that their benefit package leaned toward the very comprehensive side, with a rating of 7.85.

One respondent from Tennessee summed this up well, saying, “401k match + great health benefits + equity.”

7.85
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 = Not comprehensive 10 = Very Comprehensive

Advice for students

Respondents provided advice across several areas and what the future brings. A total of 16.2% of the managed care pharmacists indicated that they see growth in this area moving forward. Information from several of the pharmacists is listed below:

  • “To continue to engage in industry opportunities, don’t limit to a PharmD alone, and continue to be scientifically curious.”
  • “Patient care, less task oriented.”
  • “Learn how to learn.”
  • “Increased interest in the value of new medicines, beyond safety and efficacy!”
  • “Stay open minded, your career may look different than you expect.”

Critical factors

Opportunities for advancement 8.50
Leadership development/professional involvement 7.69
Community impact 7.07
Autonomy 7.79
Focus 7.54
Prestige 7.50
Creating value/positive outcomes 7.61
Patient relationships 1.21
Coworker/client relationships 7.89
Writing/conducting research 5.14
Generating new ideas 7.79
Supervision/management 5.86
Patient interaction 0.75
Public interaction 2.64
Collaboration 7.22
Family/leisure time 6.48
Impact on well-being 7.11
Problem solving 5.55
Expertise 7.52
Repetition 6.00
Applying scientific knowledge 6.96
Applying clinical knowledge 6.15
Parental leave 6.11
Compensation 7.96
Benefit package 7.85

References/resources

Schommer JC, Sogol EM, Brown LM. Work profile factors identified from the career pathway evaluation program, 2018 pharmacist profile survey. Am J Pharm. 2019;83(10):7480.

Pharmaceutical director salaries. Glassdoor. Available at: www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/pharmaceutical-director-salary-SRCH_KO0,23.htm#. Accessed July 1, 2025.

How pharmacists can start a career in the pharmaceutical industry. The Pharmaceutical Journal. Available at:https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/feature/how-pharmacists-can-start-a-career-in-the-pharmaceutical-industry. Accessed July 1, 2025.

Professional organizations

Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)

675 North Washington Street, Suite 220, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 684-2600 | www.amcp.org

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)

190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60603-3446
(312) 664-3575 | www.acpe-accredit.org

American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP)

1400 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202
(703) 739-2330 | www.aacp.org

American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS)

Avedisian Hall, 7 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881
(703) 556-0650 | www.aaps.org

American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP)

8055 O Street, Suite S113, Lincoln, NE 68510
(402) 476-1677 | www.aapp.org

American College of Apothecaries (ACA)

2830 Summer Oaks Drive, Bartlett, TN 38134
(901) 383-8119 | www.acainfo.org

American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)

13000 West 87th Street Parkway, Lenexa, KS 66215-4530
(913) 492-3311 | www.accp.com

American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education (AFPE)

11325 Random Hills Road, Suite 360A-105, Fairfax, VA 22030
(571) 404-0471 | www.afpenet.org

American Pharmacists Association (APhA)

2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 628-4410 | www.pharmacist.com

American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP)

1240 North Pitt Street, Suite 300, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 739-1300 | www.ascp.com

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)

4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD 20814
(866) 279-0681 | www.ashp.org

Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS)

2215 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20037
(202) 946-5026 | www.bpsweb.org

Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA)

555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, WI 53202
(877) 467-2791 | www.hoparx.org

National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations (NASPA)

2530 Professional Road, North Chesterfield, VA 23235
(804) 285-4431 | www.naspa.us

National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP)

1600 Feehanville Drive, Mount Prospect, IL 60056
(847) 391-4406 | www.nabp.pharmacy

National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS)

1776 Wilson Blvd, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22209
(703) 549-3001 | www.nacds.org

National Association of Specialty Pharmacy (NASP)

300 New Jersey Ave, NW, #900, Washington, DC 20001
(703) 842.0122 | www.naspnet.org

National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA)

100 Daingerfield Road, Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 683-8200 | www.ncpa.org

National Pharmaceutical Association (NPhA)

10810 North Tatum Boulevard, Suite 102-965, Phoenix, AZ 85028
(480) 405-9291 | www.nationalpharmaceuticalassociation.org

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)

670 Maine Avenue, SW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20024
(202) 835-3400 | www.phrma.org

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT