help + privacy policy + contact us + links + home
 
About APhACareerse-CommunitiesMeetingsPublicationsJoin APhA
Shop APhA  

APhA2010 Annual Meeting Washington DC

APhA CEO Blog

APhA 
Foundation


Print this page

RHEUMATOLOGIC DISORDERS     Arthur A. Schuna, Section Advisor

Treatment of early RA with infliximab is beneficial

Key point: The addition of infliximab (Remicade—Centocor) to methotrexate resulted in a superior clinical response compared with the addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who did not respond to 3 to 4 months of methotrexate monotherapy.

Finer points: van Vollenhoven and colleagues published results of the Swefot (Swedish Pharmacotherapy) study, a randomized, multicenter, active controlled trial involving 258 patients with early RA, in the August 8 Lancet. Eligible patients included those with a history of RA for less than a year who failed to respond to 3 to 4 months of methotrexate monotherapy. Patients with a disease-activity score of more than 3.2, based on a 28-joint count (DAS28), after a trial of methotrexate were randomized to either sulfasalazine 1,000 mg twice daily plus hydroxychloroquine 400 mg daily (n = 130) or infliximab 3 mg/kg given at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter (n = 128). Both regimens were given in addition to the methotrexate regimen of 20 mg per week and dose adjustments for the agents were permitted during the trial.

At 1 year, 39% of patients in the infliximab group compared with 25% of patients in the sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine group achieved a good response, defined as a decrease in the DAS28 score by 1.2 and a resulting DAS28 score of 3.2 or lower (P = 0.0160). In addition, significantly more patients randomized to infliximab achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 and ACR50 responses compared with the sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine group (ACR20 42% vs. 28%, P = 0.0266; ACR50 25% vs. 15%, P = 0.0424). The rate of adverse events was similar between the two groups; 21% of patients in the infliximab group experienced at least one adverse event compared with 25% of patients in the sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine group.

What you need to know: This study found more patients achieved favorable treatment outcomes when infliximab was added to methotrexate when compared with a triple regimen of methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and sulfasalazine. It is important to note, however, that 1 of every 4 patients achieved good response to the triple drug regimen; both approaches should be considered valid treatment options for patients. In 2008, ACR published recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for patients with RA. For patients with high disease activity and features of poor prognosis (poor functional status, extra-articular disease, positive rheumatoid factor, positive anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies or bony erosions), anti-TNF drugs plus methotrexate may be considered if cost or insurance limitations are not a factor. ACR recommends methotrexate in combination with other nonbiologic DMARDs for patients who have cost or insurance restrictions.

What your patients need to know: Patients who do not respond adequately to methotrexate alone need to be aware that multiple options are available that may result in better treatment outcomes. Combination therapy with TNF alpha inhibitors or nonbiologic DMARDs may provide improvement when methotrexate alone fails to achieve adequate outcomes.

Sources

Related resources on www.pharmacist.com

Joe Sheffer (jsheffer@aphanet.org)
Posted October 27, 2009