help + privacy policy + contact us + links + home
 
About APhACareerse-CommunitiesMeetingsPublicationsJoin APhA
Newsroom  

Advertisement


Advertisement


American 
Pharmacists 
Month

APhA CEO Blog

APhA 
Foundation



2010 International Pharmaceutical Federation PSWC and AAPS Annual 
Meeting

Print this page

RHEUMATOLOGIC DISORDERS     Arthur A. Schuna, Section Advisor

Registry data indicate rituximab safe and effective for SLE

Key point: A prospective analysis of the French Autoimmunity and Rituximab (AIR) registry showed that rituximab (Rituxan—Genentech; Biogen Idec) was satisfactorily tolerated and had clinical efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Efficacy results from the AIR registry are similar to data analyses from open-label trials, but contrary to analyses from randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Finer points: Benjamin Terrier, MD, and colleagues conducted a prospective analysis of data from patients with SLE enrolled in the French AIR registry. The analysis included 136 patients with SLE from 44 centers who received rituximab from September 2005 to June 2009. Disease severity was assessed using mean baseline Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA)–SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI); other endpoints included at least 50% improvement or resolution of cutaneous and articular disease manifestations as determined by the clinician in charge. In all, 113 patients reached the 3-month visit minimum to be included in the efficacy analysis. Mean duration of follow-up was 18.6 months, and only 0.7% of patients were lost to follow-up. Overall response after rituximab treatment was observed in 71% (80/113) of patients using the SLEDAI assessment (as indicated by a decrease in SLEDAI by at least 3) and in 77% (87/113) of patients according to the evaluation by the clinician in charge. Overall response was not significantly different between patients receiving rituximab monotherapy or combina-tion therapy with immunosuppressive agents. The mean prednisone dosage decreased from 30.3 ± 23.6 mg at baseline to 12.3 ± 10 mg/d after 6 ± 3 months (P < 0.001). A relapse was observed in 31 of 76 responders after 6 months of rituximab use; 25 of these 31 patients received rituximab retreatment and a response was observed in 20 of 22 evaluable patients. Severe infusion reactions (anaphylaxis and hypotension), serum sickness-like reactions, and severe infections were reported in 2, 5, and 12 patients, respectively. Death from severe infection was observed in 5 patients. Terrier et al. concluded that rituximab demonstrated good clinical efficacy, a corticosteroid sparing effect, and a satisfactory tolerance profile.

What you need to know: Rituximab for the treatment of SLE is controversial. Data from open-label trials have shown efficacy with rituximab treatment; however, two randomized, controlled trials failed to meet their primary endpoints. The methods of evaluating efficacy used by Terrier et al. (clinician assessment of improvement and SLEDAI), while practical, may be subjective and therefore inaccurate. Editorialists commented that the differences in results between AIR and the randomized, controlled trials could be attributed to the rigor, complexity, and breadth of the different endpoints that were measured to assess clinical efficacy in each type of trial.

What your patients need to know: Tell patients with SLE that rituximab has been shown to be effective in open-label and observational trials, but not in controlled clinical trials. Additional controlled trials may help identify which SLE patients benefit from rituximab treatment. Encourage patients who are not responding to conventional SLE therapies to discuss their treatment options with their prescribing physician.

Sources:

Posted by Alex Egervary (aegervary@aphanet.org)
July 6, 2010, 9:15 am